Holmes v. Meleady et al
| Marlon Holmes |
| T. Meleady, D. Quinn, S. Marangoudakis, T. O'Shea, D. William, T. Nehmer, D. West, A. Casillas and Richard Tosoni |
| 1:2009cv11219 |
| July 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. In accordance with the foregoing, 27 Defendants' Motion to Transfer is DENIED; 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint is ALLOWED; 38 Plaintiff's Moti on for Extension of Time upon a Showing of Excusable Neglect is DENIED AS MOOT; 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DENIED AS MOOT; 40 Plaintiff's Motion for a Status Inquiry is DENIED AS MOOT; 21 De fendants' Original Motion to Dismiss is deemed to apply to Plaintiff's amended complaint and is ALLOWED; and Plaintiff's amended complaint is, with respect to all claims other than his purported claim for malicious prosecution, DISMISSED with prejudice but, as to that enumerated claim, it is DISMISSED without prejudice and plaintiff may, if he chooses, file an amended claim related thereto within 45 days of this order. So Ordered.(Abaid, Kimberly)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
