Davis v. Middlesex Sheriff's Department

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Davis v. Middlesex Sheriff's Department

Davis v. Middlesex Sheriff's Department

Plaintiff:	Michael Joseph Davis, Sr.
Defendant:	Middlesex Sheriff's Department
Case Number:	1:2009cv11453
Filed:	September 1, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Middlesex
Presiding Judge:	Douglas P. Woodlock
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 14, 2010	Filing 10 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Letter/Request (Docket No. 9): Plaintiff's request for action against the Middlesex County Sheriff's Office with respect to notifying this Court as to his change of address is DENIED; Plaintiff's request for action against the Middlesex County Sheriffs Office with respect to his legal mail is DENIED; Should Plaintiff seek to assert claims with respect to his legal mail, he must file a separate lawsuit after exhaust ion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and must pay the $350.00 filing fee for any new civil action, or demonstrate good cause why he should not be deemed a three strikes litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) with respect to any in forma pauperis request; The Clerk shall send copies of the docket sheets and Orders of this Court made in plaintiffs civil actions, to the plaintiff at his familys address in Hyde Park, MA; All further mailings shall be sent to plaintiff a t the Bristol County Sheriffs Dept. unless plaintiff advises of a change of mailing address; Plaintiff's request for appointment of pro bono counsel is DENIED; and within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall demonstr ate good cause why this action should not be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 7), failing which, this action shall be dismissed on the merits.(PSSA, 1)[Remark: copy of Memorandum and Order sent to Michael Joseph Davis, Sr. (ID No. 110635), Bristol County Sheriff's Department, 400 Faunce Corner Road, North Dartmouth, MA 02747]
May 20, 2010	Filing 7 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is ALLOWED and the filing fee is assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); and Within 42 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall demonstrate good cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed in its entirety, or he shall file an Amended Complaint curing the pleading deficiencies. (PSSA, 1)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 14, 2010

Filing 10 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Letter/Request (Docket No. 9): Plaintiff's request for action against the Middlesex County Sheriff's Office with respect to notifying this Court as to his change of address is DENIED; Plaintiff's request for action against the Middlesex County Sheriffs Office with respect to his legal mail is DENIED; Should Plaintiff seek to assert claims with respect to his legal mail, he must file a separate lawsuit after exhaust ion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, and must pay the $350.00 filing fee for any new civil action, or demonstrate good cause why he should not be deemed a three strikes litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) with respect to any in forma pauperis request; The Clerk shall send copies of the docket sheets and Orders of this Court made in plaintiffs civil actions, to the plaintiff at his familys address in Hyde Park, MA; All further mailings shall be sent to plaintiff a t the Bristol County Sheriffs Dept. unless plaintiff advises of a change of mailing address; Plaintiff's request for appointment of pro bono counsel is DENIED; and within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall demonstr ate good cause why this action should not be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 7), failing which, this action shall be dismissed on the merits.(PSSA, 1)[Remark: copy of Memorandum and Order sent to Michael Joseph Davis, Sr. (ID No. 110635), Bristol County Sheriff's Department, 400 Faunce Corner Road, North Dartmouth, MA 02747]

May 20, 2010

Filing 7 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is ALLOWED and the filing fee is assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); and Within 42 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall demonstrate good cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed in its entirety, or he shall file an Amended Complaint curing the pleading deficiencies. (PSSA, 1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Middlesex Sheriff's Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Joseph Davis, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Middlesex Sheriff's Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?