Martin v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Company et al
| Gina Martin |
| Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mead Johnson & Company |
| 1:2009cv11609 |
| September 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Essex |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| None |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. 1) with respect to the issue of this Courts personal jurisdiction over Mead Johnson Nutrition Company(MJNC), the unjust enrichment claim and the claim for untrue and misleading advertisi ng in violation of Mass.Gen. Laws ch. 266, ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, but2) with respect to the Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A claim and the Defendants motion to strike, REJECTED.As a consequence, A. Defendants motion to dismiss (Docket No. 16) is1) with respect to Plaintiffs claims a) against the Defendant MJNC, b) for untrue and misleading advertising in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266 and c) for unjust enrichment, ALLOWED, but2) with respect to Plaintiffs claim for violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (Mass.Gen. Laws ch. 93A), DENIED; and B. Defendants motion to strike (Docket No. 19) is DENIED.(Nicewicz, Craig)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
