Manning et al v. Boston Medical Center Corporation et al
| Elizabeth Manning, Lisa Rivers and Rhonda Williams |
| Boston Medical Center Corporation, Elaine Ullian, James Canavan, Boston Regional Medical Center, LLC and Boston Regional Medical Center, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv11724 |
| October 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
Judge Rya W. Zobel: ORDER entered granting 36 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Pro cedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document.; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document.; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice as to the recharacterized 301 count and with prejudice as to all other counts; denying 11 Motion to Remand (Urso, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
