Winfield v. Florent et al
Marie Winfield |
Joseph J. Florent, Michael Shinners, Jason Pearl, Michael Watson and Comfort Suites Hotel |
1:2010cv10134 |
January 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Barnstable |
Joseph L. Tauro |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 Judge Joseph L. Tauro:ORDER entered. After reviewing Parties' submissions, this court hereby orders that: Defendants Watson and Comfort Suites Hotel's Motion for Entry of Separate and Final Judgment 19 is ALLOWED. No additional claims ex ist against Defendant Watson nor Defendant Comfort Suites Hotel. Defendants Shinners and Pearl's for Summary Judgment 21 is ALLOWED. Plaintiff was convicted of being a disorderly person and thus has not claim against Defendants for false arrest. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
Filing 18 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered ALLOWED 10 Motion to Dismiss by Michael Watson and Comfort Suites Hotel; ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART 12 Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Counts I and III through VII. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Count II; DENIED AS MOOT 17 Motion for Ruling to the extent that the Motion for Ruling requests a " No Harassment Order," that request is DENIED. IT IS S O ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.