Spring Investor Services, Inc. v. Carrington Capital Management, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Spring Investor Services, Inc. v. Carrington Capital Management, LLC

Spring Investor Services, Inc. v. Carrington Capital Management, LLC

Plaintiff:	Spring Investor Services, Inc.
Defendant:	Carrington Capital Management, LLC
Case Number:	1:2010cv10166
Filed:	February 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Nancy Gertner
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 18, 2013	Filing 130 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: AMENDED AND CORRECTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's 68 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED asto defendant's obligation to pay a commission on the fees it has earned on undisputed accounts and as to defendant's chapter 93A claim, and otherwise DENIED, and defendant's 71 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED as to plaintiff's chapter 93A claim, and otherwise DENIED.(Cicolini, Pietro)
March 28, 2013	Filing 127 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Plaintiff's 68 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED as to defendant's obligation to pay a commission on the fees it has earned on undisputed accounts and otherwise DENIED, and defendant's 71 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED as to plaintiff's chapter 93A claim, and otherwise DENIED.(Cicolini, Pietro)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 18, 2013

Filing 130 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: AMENDED AND CORRECTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff's 68 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED asto defendant's obligation to pay a commission on the fees it has earned on undisputed accounts and as to defendant's chapter 93A claim, and otherwise DENIED, and defendant's 71 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED as to plaintiff's chapter 93A claim, and otherwise DENIED.(Cicolini, Pietro)

March 28, 2013

Filing 127 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Plaintiff's 68 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED as to defendant's obligation to pay a commission on the fees it has earned on undisputed accounts and otherwise DENIED, and defendant's 71 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED as to plaintiff's chapter 93A claim, and otherwise DENIED.(Cicolini, Pietro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spring Investor Services, Inc. v. Carrington Capital Management, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spring Investor Services, Inc.
Represented By:	Marbree D. Sullivan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carrington Capital Management, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?