Felder v. Dickhaut
| Maurice Felder |
| Thomas Dickhaut |
| 1:2010cv10233 |
| February 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Barnstable |
| Joseph L. Tauro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
Judge Joseph L. Tauro:ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Maurice Felder.This court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the August 26, 2013 Report and Recommendation 43 of Magistrate Judge Collings. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this court hereby orders that Petitioners Petition 1 is DENIED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
|
Filing
23
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered re 22 ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). This court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the 6/9/2011 Report and Recommendation 22 of Magistrate Judge Collings. For the reas ons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this court hereby orders that Petitioner's Petition 1 DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Petitioner filing a new petition within 162 days of the date on which the state court have acted with finality on his motion for a new trial. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
|
Filing
18
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. On February 8, 2010, Petitioner submitted a similar Motion re 3 which this court denied in ORDER 13 of April 29, 2010. For the reasons set forth in that ORDER, Petitioner's Motion to Stay Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 17 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
|
Filing
16
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. After reviewing the written submissions, this court hereby orders that: Respondent's Motion for Leave to Dispense with the Conference Requirement of Local Rule 7.1 8 is ALLOWED. Respondent's Motion f or Scheduling Order 14 is DENIED AS MOOT IN PART and ALLOWED IN PART. To the extent that the deadlines that Respondent requests have passed, the Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. To the extent that Respondent requests a Scheduling Order, the Motion is ALLO WED. Petitioner may file any memorandum of law in support of the petition for writ of habeas corpus no later than 01/4/2011. Respondent may file any memorandum of law in opposition to the petition fort writ of of habeas corpus no later than 3/4/2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Felder v. Dickhaut | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Maurice Felder | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
