Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc. et al
| Nina Shervin, M.D. |
| Partners Healthcare System, Inc., The President and Fellows of Harvard College, Orthopaedics Associates, Inc., Massachusetts General Hospital Physicians Organization, James H. Herndon, M.D. and Harry E. Rubash, M.D. |
| 1:2010cv10601 |
| April 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Rya W. Zobel |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
269
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court DENIES IN PART Dr. Rubash's motion, D. 144, but ALLOWS it IN PART to the extent that Dr. Shervin cannot rely on conduct that occurred prior to June 5, 2008 for Dr. R ubash's liability; DENIES IN PART Dr. Herndon's motion, D. 145, but ALLOWS it IN PART to the extent that Dr. Shervin cannot rely on conduct that occurred prior to June 5, 2008 for Dr. Herndon's liability; DENIES IN PART Harvard's motion, D. 148, but ALLOWS it IN PART to the extent that Dr. Shervin cannot rely on conduct that occurred prior to December 30, 2008 for Harvard's liability; and DENIES IN PART Partners' motion, D. 149, but ALLOWS it IN PART to the extent t hat Dr. Shervin cannot rely on conduct that occurred prior to June 5, 2008 for Partners' liability and Partners is entitled to qualified immunity for the tortious interference claim. The Defendants' motion to strike, D. 236, is DENI ED. The Defendants' motion for additional time to respond to Dr. Shervin's opposition papers, D. 237 at 9, is also DENIED as moot. Dr. Shervin's motion for leave to file a surreply to the Defendants' reply briefs, D. 263, which the Court considered in resolving the instant motions, is ALLOWED nunc pro tunc. (Maynard, Timothy)
|
|
Filing
40
Judge Rya W. Zobel: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION entered; mooting Count 13 and denying 31 Motion to Dismiss; granting 34 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leav e to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document.; granting 37 Motion to Amend; granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss by the Amended Complaint. (Urso, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
