Bamberg et al v. Goldman Sachs & Co et al
| Paul G. Bamberg and Robert Roth |
| Goldman Sachs & Co, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs & Co., LLC |
| 1:2010cv10932 |
| June 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
558
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered re 549 MOTION to disallow. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, I rule as follows: 1. The Roth plaintiffs need not pay the deposition transcript costs for any depositions in which they were precluded from asking any questions. Otherwise the costs shall be shared equally. While the relationship between the Roths and the Bakers was more acrimonious over the course of the trial, the evidence in support of all o f the plaintiffs cases substantially overlapped. 2. The Court allows costs for copies at $.10 per page, the rate allowed in the First Circuit. (Color copies were not necessary) 3. The Court allows costs for th ree copies of only those exhibits introduced, sought to be introduced, or actually used at trial. The costs of deposition transcripts of witnesses are allowed. 4. Otherwise, the objections are DENIED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
|
Filing
533
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 505 Motion for a new trial and Motion for Judgment as a matter of law entered. (LaFlamme, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
531
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. "ORDER: The plaintiffs motions (Doc No. 482, 1:09-cv-10053; Doc. No. 503 , 1:10-cv-10932; Doc. No. 515 , 1:10-cv-10932) are DENIED." (LaFlamme, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
280
Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. After hearing and review of the record, the Court rules on the motions as follows: 1. Defendant Goldman Sachs & Co.s (Goldman) motion for summary judgment on the Baker plaintiffs claims (Doc. No. 178, 09-cv-10053) is DENIED. 2. Defendant Goldmans motion for summary judgment on the Roth plaintiffs claims (Doc. No. 133 , 10-cv-10932) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs Robert Roth and Paul G. Bambergs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 144 , 10-cv-10932) is DENIED. 4. Plaintiffs Janet and James Bakers motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 198, 09-cv-10053) IS ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court DENIES the motion as to Goldmans liability for negligent and intentional misreprese ntation, and under the Massachusetts Unfair or Deceptive Practices Act. The Court ALLOWS the motion as to Goldmans counterclaims against Janet Baker. 5. Plaintiffs Janet and James Bakers motion for summary judgment as to Goldmans third-party complaint (Doc. No. 197 , 10-cv-10932) IS ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to Goldmans third-party contribution claims. The Court ALLOWS the motion as to Goldmans indemnification claim. (Anderson, Jennifer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
