Cryer v. UMass Medical Correctional et al
| Derek Sincere Black Wolf Cryer |
| UMass Medical Correctional, Terre K. Marshall, Dyana Nickl, Russell Phelps, Marlene Dodge, Angela D'Antonio, Lynn Saroa, Thomas Dickhaut and Pamela M O'Dell |
| 1:2010cv11346 |
| July 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Patti B. Saris |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
Judge Patti B. Saris: ENDORSED ORDER entered ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 85 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 54 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 56 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 62 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 62 Moti on to Substitute Party; GRANTING 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING AS MOOT 27 Motion to Dismiss. "After a review of the objections, which were very difficult to read, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Defendants shall submit a form of Judgment." (Anderson, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
65
Judge Patti B. Saris: ENDORSED ORDER entered ADOPTING Report and Recommendations re 61 Report and Recommendations, and DENYING 46 Motion for Default Judgment. "I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation." (Anderson, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
30
Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: Letter (Docket No. 21):Plaintiffs Letter (Docket No. 21) depositing summonses with the Court in accordance with Rule 5, is deemed to be insufficient service of process on the defendants in this action; To the extent the Letter (Docket No. 21) is construed as a request for an Order directing the Clerks Office to effect service of process on behalf of the plaintiff, it is DENIED; the Clerk shall reissue summonses as to defendants (Dickh aut, ODell, UMass Medical Correctional, Angela D'Antonio, Marlene Dodge, Terre K. Marshall, Dyana Nickl, Russell Phelps, and Lynn Saroa); and the Court requests defense counsel provide a Status Report with respect to the plaintiff's medical care, within 14 days.(PSSA, 1)[Remark: copy of this Memorandum and Order to legal counsel at Massachusetts Department of Correction, 70 Franklin Street, Suite 600, Boston, MA 02110, and to the Legal Department, Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Room 2019, One Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108-1698.]
|
|
Filing
12
Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Plaintiff'S Motion Showing Cause and Request [for] Summons Against Defendants Dickhaut, ODell and UMCH (Docket No. 11)entered: The Clerk shall issue summonses only as to defendants: (1) Thomas Dickh aut; (2) Pamela ODell; and (3) UMass Medical Correction Health; The Clerk shall send the summonses, Complaint, and this Order to Cryer, who must thereafter serve the defendants Thomas Dickhaut, Pamela ODell, and UMass Medical Correctional Health in a ccordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Cryer may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by Cryer to do so, the United States Marshal Service shall serve the summonses, Complaint, and this Order up on the defendants, in the manner directed by Cryer, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, Cryer shall have 120 days from the date of this Order to complete service; and All of Cryer's claims against defendant Thompson are DISMISSED without prejudice. (PSSA, 1)
|
|
Filing
3
Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: SEALING COURT DOCUMENTS entered. (Patch, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
