Upshaw v. Andrade et al
| Solomon Upshaw |
| Matthew Andrade and Sea Trade Express, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv11517 |
| September 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph L. Tauro |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 11702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered. This Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the March 2.2012 Report and Recommendation Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint 42 of Magistrate Judge Bowler. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this court hereby orders that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint 26 is ALLOWED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
|
Filing
30
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 22 Report and Recommendations, Action on motion: After reviewing the August 10, 2011 Report and Recommendation 22 of Magistrate Judge Bowler and Plaintiff's Object ion 29 , this court hereby orders that it ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this court hereby orders that Plaintiff's Motion Leave to Amend 6 is ALLOWED and Plaintiff's motion for Writ of Injunction 8 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
