Discipio v. Anacomp, Inc. et al
| Arthur J. Discipio |
| Anacomp, Inc., Howard Dratler, Jeffrey Cartwright, Michael E. Tennenbaum, Alan B Howe, Michael Leitner and Phil Tseng |
| 1:2010cv11518 |
| September 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Unassigned - CIV |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
Judge Denise J. Casper: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Stay filed by Anacomp, Inc., 36 Report and Recommendations. Action on motion: For the foregoing reasons, Discipios obje ctions to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Collings are overruled and the report and recommendation is accepted by the Court. Accordingly, Anacomps motion to dismiss and/or motion to stay the amended complaint (#21) is ALLOWED to th e extent that the plaintiffs severance pay claim under the Massachusetts Wage Act be DISMISSED; and Anacomps motion to dismiss and/or motion to stay the amended complaint is ALLOWED to the extent a stay is requested as to all other claims in the amended complaint and that these claims be referred to arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause in the employment agreement. (Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
9
Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: SEALING COURT DOCUMENTS entered. (Patch, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
