Massachusetts Delivery Association v. Martha Coakley, Attorney General

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Massachusetts Delivery Association v. Martha Coakley, Attorney General

Massachusetts Delivery Association v. Martha Coakley, Attorney General

Plaintiff:	Massachusetts Delivery Association
Defendant:	Martha Coakley, Attorney General
Case Number:	1:2010cv11521
Filed:	September 7, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Nature of Suit:	Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action:	49 U.S.C. § 1471 Federal Aviation Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 8, 2015	Filing 185 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court ALLOWS MDA's motion for summary judgment, D. 156, and DENIES the Attorney General's cross-motion for summary judgment, D 82, 174.(Hourihan, Lisa)
September 26, 2013	Filing 123 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court DENIES MDA's motion for summary judgment, D. 67, and DENIES the Attorney General's cross-motion for summary judgment, D. 82, to the extent that it sought dismissal of this action on the grounds that this case did not present a justiciable case or controversy, but ALLOWS the relief requested by the Attorney General to the extent that Counts I and III are DISMISSED. See D. 80 at 1. The Court also and DENIES AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Attorney General's motion to compel, D. 96, and ALLOWS MDA's motion for a protective order. D. 94. (Hourihan, Lisa)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 8, 2015

Filing 185 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court ALLOWS MDA's motion for summary judgment, D. 156, and DENIES the Attorney General's cross-motion for summary judgment, D 82, 174.(Hourihan, Lisa)

September 26, 2013

Filing 123 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court DENIES MDA's motion for summary judgment, D. 67, and DENIES the Attorney General's cross-motion for summary judgment, D. 82, to the extent that it sought dismissal of this action on the grounds that this case did not present a justiciable case or controversy, but ALLOWS the relief requested by the Attorney General to the extent that Counts I and III are DISMISSED. See D. 80 at 1. The Court also and DENIES AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Attorney General's motion to compel, D. 96, and ALLOWS MDA's motion for a protective order. D. 94. (Hourihan, Lisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Massachusetts Delivery Association v. Martha Coakley, Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Martha Coakley, Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Massachusetts Delivery Association
Represented By:	David C. Casey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?