Provanzano v. Parker View Farm, Inc. et al
| Joseph S. Provanzano |
| Parker View Farm, Inc., Robert M. Turner, LM Turner Stables, Inc. and Bridgette M. Parker |
| 1:2010cv11893 |
| November 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Essex |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: " In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motions for reconsideration (Docket Nos. 33 and 34 ) are DENIED. So ordered.(Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
31
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) defendants motion to reconsider (Docket No. 24 ) is ALLOWED pursuant to Rules 59(e) or 60(b), and 2) Upon reconsideration, defendants renewed motion to dismiss (Docket No. 26 ) is ALLOWED, and 3) Defendants original motion to dismiss (Docket No. 3 )is DENIED as moot. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
19
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) plaintiff's motion to remand and for attorney's fees (Docket No. 11 ) is DENIED; 2) defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 3 ) is DENIED; 3) defendants' motion for a protective order (Docket No. 14 ) is ALLOWED; and 4) Attorney Andrew S. Breines is directed to file a noticeof appearance in this case." (Duong, Diep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
