Duclerc v. Bender et al
Plaintiff: Aurelio Duclerc
Defendant: James Bender, Peter St. Amand and Peter A. Pepe
Case Number: 1:2010cv12050
Filed: November 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Norfolk
Presiding Judge: Douglas P. Woodlock
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court ALLOWS the dismissal of the DOC, see footnote 1, and GRANTS the DOC Defendants' motion for summary judgment and DENIES Duclerc's motion for partial summary judgment.(Hourihan, Lisa)
December 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND oRDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 6) is ALLOWED and the filing fee is assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); Plaintiff's request to treat t his case as a class action and for appointment of pro bono counsel (both contained in the body of the Complaint) are DENIED without prejudice to renew after a responsive pleading is filed, upon a motion filed in accordance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Docket No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice to renew after the defendants have filed a responsive pleading; Plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order and/or prelimi nary injunction (contained in the body of the Complaint) is DENIED without prejudice to renew after a responsive pleading is filed; The Clerk shall issue summonses as to each defendant; and The Clerk shall send the summons(es), Complaint, and this Or der to the plaintiff, who must thereafter serve the defendant(s) in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve the summons(es), complaint, and this Order upon the defendant, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States Marshal Service. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 120 days from the date of this Order to complete service. (PSSA, 1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duclerc v. Bender et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aurelio Duclerc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Bender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter St. Amand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter A. Pepe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?