Desai v. Hovsepian et al
| Mohan Desai |
| Ronald W. Hovsepian, Albert Aiello, Jr., Fred Corrado, Richard L. Crandall, Richard L. Nolan, John W Poduska, Sr., Patrick S Jones, Gary Greenfield, Judith Hamilton and Attachmate Corporation |
| 1:2010cv12076 |
| December 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Barnstable |
| Marianne B. Bowler |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
Judge Rya W. Zobel: ORDER entered denying 46 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part as moot 49 Motion to Stay; granting 51 Motion to Dismiss; granting 56 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Ca se Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document.; grantin g 57 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. A status report is due on 7/31/12. (Urso, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
