Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Sandoz Inc. and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv12079
Filed: December 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 260 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, Teva's motion for attorneys' fees (Docket No. 233 ) is DENIED.So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 224 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for entry of final judgment (Docket No. 209 ) is, with respect to defendant's First Counterclaim for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,790,466, DENIED, but is, in all other respects, ALLOWED. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
July 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 205 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting 144 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Third Amended Infringement Contentions filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, granting 135 MOTION for Summary Judg ment (Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or, in the Alternative, Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement on Safe Harbor Grounds filed by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, denying 161 MOTION to Amend filed by Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz Inc. (Patch, Christine)
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 111 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered granting 109 Motion for Clarification re 108 Memorandum & ORDER (Patch, Christine)
June 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 108 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(Moore, Kellyann)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandoz Inc.
Represented By: Michael E. Murawski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Represented By: Robert S. Frank, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?