Saltzman v. Town of Hanson et al
| Bonita Saltzman |
| Town of Hanson, Michael Finglas and Jean Marie Smith |
| 1:2011cv10056 |
| January 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| Marianne B. Bowler |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. FINAL JUDGMENT. The issues having been duly heard and decisions rendered by this court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that plaintiff Bonita Saltzman take nothing and this action be dismissed on the merits.. (Feeney, Eileen)
|
|
Filing
44
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. In accordance with the foregoing discussion, the Town's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 28 ) is ALLOWED on all counts. Similarly, in accordance with the foregoing discussion, Finglas and Smith's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 30 ) is ALLOWED on all counts.(Garvin, Brendan)
|
|
Filing
18
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE BY DEFENDANTS TOWN OF HANSON, MICHAEL FINGLAS, SR. AND JEAN MARIE SMITH (DOCKET ENTRY #9)is DENIED. The parties shall appear for a status conference on November 9, 2011, at 2:30 p.m. (Feeney, Eileen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
