WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co.
| WBIP, LLC |
| Kohler Co. |
| 1:2011cv10374 |
| March 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Bristol |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
295
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: " For the foregoing reasons, 1) Kohler's motion for disallowance of costs (Docket No. 284 ) is, with respect to the expenses of obtaining the transcripts of the depositions of Christopher Barry and Robert Brooks, ALLOWED, but is otherwise DENIED; 2) Kohler is ordered to pay WBIP for $1,660,445 in attorneys' fees; 3) Kohler is taxed $20,882 in costs incurred by WBIP; and 4) Kohler is to pay $423,267 in pre-judgment interest to WBIP. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
274
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting in part and denying in part 232 MOTION for an accounting and for pre- and post-judgment interest, filed by WBIP, LLC, granting in part and denying in part 225 MOTI ON for New Trial filed by Kohler Co., denying 259 MOTION for Reconsideration of Court's Order Denying Motion for Permanent Injunction filed by WBIP, LLC, granting in part and taking under advisement 230 MOTION for Enhanced damages and Attorney Fees and costs filed by WBIP, LLC, and granting 223 Motion for an ongoing royalty. See Order for details. (Patch, Christine)
|
|
Filing
257
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction or in the alternative an ongoing royalty (Docket No. 223 ) is, with respect to plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction, DENIED, but otherwise remains under advisment. 2) Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 227 ) is DENIED. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
181
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. (Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
171
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. " In accordance with the foregoing, and as previously ruled, 1) Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 76 ) is DENIED, 2) Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 79 ) is DENIED, and 3) Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony (Docket No. 82 ) is DENIED. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
45
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(Moore, Kellyann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WBIP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrea B. Reed |
| Represented By: | David A. Simons |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Zeliger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kohler Co. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
