Roberts et al v. St. Amand et al
| Brandon Roberts and Patrick Nerette |
| Peter St. Amand and Thomas N Neville |
| 1:2011cv10760 |
| May 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| Mark L. Wolf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying 65 Motion ; denying 66 Motion for Discovery; granting 82 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 80 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Responses due by 5/30/2017) (Halley, Taylor)
|
|
Filing
61
Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 58 Motion to Alter Judgment (Halley, Taylor)
|
|
Filing
60
Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ORDER entered. The Court will grant the plaintiff an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order in which to respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Failure to respond will result in the denial of the plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment as to Neville and the dismissal will stand. Response due 8/12/2016.(Halley, Taylor)
|
|
Filing
57
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Halley, Taylor)
|
|
Filing
34
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC OPINION AND ORDER entered granting 32 Motion to Dismiss (Danieli, Chris)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
