United States, ex rel., Witkin, et al. v. Medtronic, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: Adam Witkin, State of Virginia, Doe States 1-23 and United States of America
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Minimed, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv10790
Filed: May 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Douglas P. Woodlock
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 272 Judge Indira Talwani: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. For the foregoing reasons, Medtronic's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Witkins Retaliation Claims [Doc. No. 172 ] is DENED.IT IS SO ORDERED. (Kelly, Danielle)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 86 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, specifically GRANTED as to Counts I and II with respect to relator's claims concerning fraudulent promotion and ineligible pump orders and as to Count V; DENIED as to Counts I and II with respect to kickback-related claims and as to Counts III, IV and VI (Woodlock, Douglas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States, ex rel., Witkin, et al. v. Medtronic, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Witkin
Represented By: Peter W. Chatfield
Represented By: Frederick M. Morgan, Jr.
Represented By: David H. Rich
Represented By: Jennifer M. Verkamp
Represented By: Christopher Weld, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: State of Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doe States 1-23
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Gregg D. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc.
Represented By: Samantha Barrett Badlam
Represented By: James P. Dowden
Represented By: Michael K. Fee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic Minimed, Inc.
Represented By: Samantha Barrett Badlam
Represented By: James P. Dowden
Represented By: Michael K. Fee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?