Asadoorian v. Travis, et al
Plaintiff: Richard Asadoorian
Defendant: Joseph Travis, Maureen Atkins, Dyana Nickl and Peter J. Heffernan
Case Number: 1:2011cv10963
Filed: May 31, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Norfolk
Presiding Judge: Denise J. Casper
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Judge Denise J. Casper: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for the Court to Pay Service of Process Fees to Sheriff (Docket No. 20) is DENIED; Defendant Heffernan's Motion to Extend Time to October 11, 2011 to file a Response ( Docket No. 27) is ALLOWED; Defendant Heffernan's Motion to Waive Local Rule 7.1 (Docket No. 28) is ALLOWED; The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Docket No. 29) is DENIED without prejudice; and Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the d ate of this Memorandum and Order to conduct further investigation or limited discovery with respect to the proper service of process issues on Defendants Atkins, Nickl, and Travis, or to seek a waiver of service from defense counsel, or to seek other appropriate relief from this Court. Failure of Plaintiff to take action in this regard may result in a dismissal of claims against Defendants Atkins, Nickl, and Travis. (PSSA, 1)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Judge Denise J. Casper: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for a TRO/Preliminary Injunction and Hearing (Docket No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice to renew his request after the defendants have filed a responsive pleading to the Complaint after service of process has been effected. At that time, Asadoorian may renew his request, addressing any matters raised by the defendants in their response. (PSSA, 1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asadoorian v. Travis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Asadoorian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Travis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maureen Atkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dyana Nickl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter J. Heffernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?