Decoulos v. Schroder et al
| Elaine M Decoulos |
| Bruno L Schroder, Suzanne Maltzahn, Associated Newspapers Ltd, Solo Syndication Ltd, The Scotsman Publications Ltd, Proquest LLC, Cengage Learning Inc, The Gale Group, Inc. and HighBeam Research, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv10972 |
| May 27, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Essex |
| Douglas P. Woodlock |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting 49 Motion to Dismiss; granting 53 Motion to Dismiss; granting 57 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 83 Motion to Dismiss; granting 86 Mo tion for relief from deadline; granting 86 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 86 Motion to Seal; granting 87 Motion for relief from deadline; granting 87 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting 87 Mo tion to Seal; denying 88 Motion to Amend; granting 88 Motion for relief from deadline; granting 94 Motion for relief from deadline; granting 94 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting ruling on 94 Motion to Seal; granting 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and directed the clerk to terminate this case. (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
