National Association of Government Employees v Mulligan et al
| National Association of Government Employees |
| Patricia A. Walsh, John Does 1-15, Bernard Dow, Francis Wall, Ronald P. Corbett, Jr., William H. Burke, III, Robert A. Mulligan, John J. O'Brien and Elizabeth Tavares |
| 1:2011cv11123 |
| June 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) because NAGE lacks associational standing to bring claims for political affiliation discrimination on behalf of its members, defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket No. 31 , 33 and 49 ) are ALLOWED, 2) the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 16 ) is DISMISSED, and 3) defendants' motion to stay proceedings (Docket No. 29 ) is DENIED as moot. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
67
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 25 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Bernard Dow.(Patch, Christine)
|
|
Filing
62
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) The joint motion to intervene filed by the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Docket No. 42 ) is ALLOWED; 2) The joint motions to s tay filed by the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Docket No. 42 -1) and defendants O'Brien and Walsh (Docket No. 29 ) are temporarily held in abeyance until after the Court rules upon the pending motions to dismiss, after w hich they will be ALLOWED and the case will be stayed pending the outcome of state and federal grand jury investigations and prosecutions; 3) Plaintiff's motion to delay adjudication, for leave to conduct further discovery and for an extension t o file an opposition (Docket No. 58 ) is DENIED; 4) The motion to dismiss and/or abstain filed by the Trial Court Defendants (Docket No. 49 ) is, with respect to the motion to abstain, DENIED. The Court reserves judgment on the motion to dismiss pe nding receipt of the opposition to be filed; and 5) Pursuant to the Court order dated October 7, 2011, plaintiff's oppositions to the motions to dismiss filed by Bernard Dow (Docket No. 25 ), William Burke (Docket No. 31 ) and Patricia Walsh and John O'Brien (Docket No. 33 ) shall be filed on or before the close of business on Wednesday, March 28, 2012. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
