Barbosa v. Conlon
| Maria Barbosa, Henriqueta Barbosa, Manuel Barbosa and Angela Barbosa |
| John Doe, 3, Emanuel Gomes, Leon McCabe, Mark Celia, Michael Dube, Frank Baez, Steven E. Johnson, Thomas Hyland, Bryan Maker, Jesse Drane, Kenneth Lofstrom, Brian Donahue, William K. Conlon, Anthony Giardini, John Doe, 2 and John Doe, 1 |
| 1:2011cv11997 |
| November 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| Judith G. Dein |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER on Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
|
|
Filing
129
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER denying 112 Defendants' Motion for New Trial. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
|
|
Filing
104
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER re Interest Rate. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
|
|
Filing
98
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
|
|
Filing
60
Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER allowing in part and denying in part 41 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dambrosio, Jolyne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
