Hodges v. Roden

Hodges v. Roden

Petitioner:	Richard Hodges
Respondent:	Gary Roden
Case Number:	1:2011cv40067
Filed:	March 24, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Norfolk
Presiding Judge:	Joseph L. Tauro
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2012	Filing 25 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered DENIED re 19 Petitioner's Second Request for a Ruling on the Petition and for a Certificate of Appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. See ORDER for Details. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
November 1, 2011	Filing 15 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. This Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the 9/17/2011 Report and Recommendation 11 of Magistrate Judge Hillman. For the reasons set forth in the Report an Recommendation, this court hereby orders that Respondent's M otion to Dismiss Petition 5 is ALLOWED WITHOUT ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. If Petitioner WISHES TO DISMISS the unexhausted claims, he must do so by Friday, 11/18/2011. If Petitioner DOES NOT WISH TO DISMISS the unexhausted claims or fails to respond by this date, the court will enter a judgment of dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2012

Filing 25 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered DENIED re 19 Petitioner's Second Request for a Ruling on the Petition and for a Certificate of Appealability. IT IS SO ORDERED. See ORDER for Details. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

November 1, 2011

Filing 15 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. This Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the 9/17/2011 Report and Recommendation 11 of Magistrate Judge Hillman. For the reasons set forth in the Report an Recommendation, this court hereby orders that Respondent's M otion to Dismiss Petition 5 is ALLOWED WITHOUT ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. If Petitioner WISHES TO DISMISS the unexhausted claims, he must do so by Friday, 11/18/2011. If Petitioner DOES NOT WISH TO DISMISS the unexhausted claims or fails to respond by this date, the court will enter a judgment of dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hodges v. Roden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Hodges
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Roden
Represented By:	Randall E. Ravitz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?