Cannon v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
| Gregory Cannon |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company, Pharmerica Temporary Disability Income Plan and Pharmerica Long Term Disability Plan |
| 1:2012cv10512 |
| March 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Denise J. Casper |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Defendants' motion for summary judgment, D. 86, is ALLOWED and Cannon's motion for summary judgment, D. 88, is DENIED.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
60
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - the Court ALLOWS Cannon's motion for attorneys' fees and costs, but reduces the award to $23,315.25 in attorneys' fees and $582.84 in costs.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
52
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED and Cannon's motion is ALLOWED in part to the extent that the Court orders remand. This case shall be REMANDED to Aetna to all ow the independent, reviewing physicians, including Dr. Weinstein, to update their reports after the record is supplemented with the additional medical records identified in Dr. Weinstein's February 7, 2011 report, including records from Cannon's primary care physician, Dr. Chiang.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
