Felix v. Town of Randolph et al
Plaintiff: Max Felix
Defendant: Town of Randolph, Town of Randolph Police Department, Kevin Donnelly, Edward O'Leary and Paul Porter
Case Number: 1:2012cv10997
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Norfolk
Presiding Judge: George A. OToole
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 120 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DECLINING to ADOPT 117 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's 108 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. See Attached Order.(DaSilva, Carolina)
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Town of Randolph's 38 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings are GRANTED. Counts II, III, IV, VI, VII, and so much of Count I as alleges a violation of the Ma ssachusetts Civil Rights Act against the Town of Randolph are dismissed with prejudice. The Police Department's 40 Motion to Dismiss is also GRANTED. The following claims survive against the Town of Randolph: Count V and any federal civil rights claims under Count I.(Danieli, Chris)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Felix v. Town of Randolph et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Max Felix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Town of Randolph
Represented By: Bradford N. Louison
Represented By: Douglas I. Louison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Town of Randolph Police Department
Represented By: Bradford N. Louison
Represented By: Douglas I. Louison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Donnelly
Represented By: Bradford N. Louison
Represented By: Douglas I. Louison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward O'Leary
Represented By: Bradford N. Louison
Represented By: Douglas I. Louison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Porter
Represented By: Bradford N. Louison
Represented By: Douglas I. Louison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?