Bartlett v. Department of Treasury
Plaintiff: Tracy Bartlett
Defendant: Department of Treasury
Case Number: 1:2012cv11443
Filed: August 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Barnstable
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 7703
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Department of Treasury. "In accordance with the foregoing, defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8) is ALLOWED and the case is DISMISSED."(Patch, Christine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartlett v. Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Bartlett
Represented By: Scott F. Gleason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?