Lewis v. West Roxbury District Court et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Lewis
Defendant: West Roxbury District Court, McKinley and Court Clerk
Case Number: 1:2012cv11544
Filed: August 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Joseph L. Tauro
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered for 46 Report and Recommendations. This court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the August 22, 2013 Report and Recommendation 46 of Magistrate Judge Boal. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, thiscourt hereby orders that Defendant West Roxbury District Courts Motion to Dismiss 12 isALLOWED; Defendant Judge Robert McKenna, Jr.s1 Motion to Dismiss 14 is ALLOWED; and Defendant Court Clerks Motion to Dismiss 16 is A LLOWED. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend 26 is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is ALLOWED to the extent that it seeks leave to (a) substitute Judge McKenna for Judge McKinley; (b) identify Erin Carey as the Court Clerk; (c) amend Plainti ffs claim of negligence and recklessness to negligence pursuant to Mass Tort Claims Act M.G.L.A. 258 s. 2; and (d) eliminate Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Plaintiffs second Motion for Leave to Amend 37 is DENIED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
January 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The $350.00 filing fee shall be collected, in monthly payments, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Defendants motion 11 to be relieved from conference requirement of Local Rule 7.1 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion 18 to Appoint Counsel is denied. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to serve and file his opposition to the defendants' motions, on or before February 1, 2013, and for the defendants to serve and file their reply, if any, on or before February 15, 2013. (PSSA, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. West Roxbury District Court et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: West Roxbury District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKinley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Court Clerk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?