Robinson v. MCI Cedar Junction
Petitioner:
William Robinson
Respondent:
MCI Cedar Junction
Case Number:
1:2012cv11931
Filed:
October 17, 2012
Court:
Massachusetts District Court
Office:
Boston Office
County:
Norfolk
Presiding Judge:
George A. OToole
Nature of Suit:
Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| September 3, 2013 | 19 |
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: OPINION AND ORDER entered granting 13 Motion to Dismiss (Danieli, Chris)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. MCI Cedar Junction | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MCI Cedar Junction | |
| Represented By: | Annette C. Benedetto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.