Exergen Corporation v. Brooklands Inc.
| Exergen Corporation |
| Brooklands Inc. |
| 1:2012cv12243 |
| December 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Douglas P. Woodlock |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
179
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered to reflect granting 178 Motion to Correct (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
|
Filing
176
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered finding as moot 126 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b); granting 138 Motion to Dismiss; granting 156 Motion for Summary Judgment (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
|
Filing
124
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment under sec. 101; finding as moot 73 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 86 Motion to Compel; denying 88 Motion for Summary Judgment as to secs. 102 and 103; denying 106 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 118 Motion for Order; granting 122 Motion for Leave to File Document. (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
|
Filing
83
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered construing claims. "The claim terms at issue will be construed for the jury and for all other purposes in the pending litigations in a manner consistent with the above rulings of the court."Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-10628-RGS, 1:12-cv-12243-DPW, 1:13-cv-11243-DJC(RGS, int2)
|
|
Filing
81
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered Limiting the Scope of the Markman Hearing. "An exploration of the Wands factors is both premature and beyond the limited intended scope of the Markman process. Accordingly, the court will not permit expert testimony on enablement at the claim construction hearing and reserve the issue for either summary judgment or trial."Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-10628-RGS, 1:12-cv-12243-DPW, 1:13-cv-11243-DJC(RGS, int2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
