Cook v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Cook v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Cook v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Kristen Cook
Defendant:	Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2013cv10143
Filed:	January 23, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Barnstable
Presiding Judge:	Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 21, 2013	Filing 28 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: " In accordance with the foregoing, defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8 ) is 1) with respect to Count I, as to the claim for wage discrimination, ALLOWED, and as to a claim for hostile work environment, DENIED and 2) with respect to Count II, as to claims for wage discrimination and reasonable accommodation, ALLOWED, and as to a claim for hostile work environment, DENIED. While the Court does not dismiss t he Complaint in its entirety, it notes that the Complaint as it stands is deficient. Plaintiff is therefore directed to file an Amended Complaint in accordance with the Court's rulings that a) alleges claims based on differing theories as separate counts and b) adequately connects the facts pled with the appropriate theory. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 21, 2013

Filing 28 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: " In accordance with the foregoing, defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 8 ) is 1) with respect to Count I, as to the claim for wage discrimination, ALLOWED, and as to a claim for hostile work environment, DENIED and 2) with respect to Count II, as to claims for wage discrimination and reasonable accommodation, ALLOWED, and as to a claim for hostile work environment, DENIED. While the Court does not dismiss t he Complaint in its entirety, it notes that the Complaint as it stands is deficient. Plaintiff is therefore directed to file an Amended Complaint in accordance with the Court's rulings that a) alleges claims based on differing theories as separate counts and b) adequately connects the facts pled with the appropriate theory. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Cook
Represented By:	Mitchell J. Notis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Represented By:	Michael K. Clarkson
Represented By:	Julia M. Brumer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?