Pavonix, Inc. v. Barclays Bank PLC

Plaintiff: Pavonix, Inc.
Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv10348
Filed: February 22, 2013
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Edward F. Harrington
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 17, 2015 134 Opinion or Order of the Court District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered adopting Report and Recommendations re 124 Report and Recommendations. After de novo review of Magistrate Judge Deins Report and Recommendations (Doc.No. 124), the Court DENIES defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 85). The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Deins conclusions that genuine issues of material fact preclude the entry of summary judgment. (Montes, Mariliz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pavonix, Inc. v. Barclays Bank PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pavonix, Inc.
Represented By: Ronald M. Davids
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?