Boston Cab Dispatch et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
| Boston Cab Dispatch and EJT Management, Inc. |
| Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv10769 |
| April 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 124 Motion to Compel and Extend Deadline to Disclose Experts (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
81
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: MEMORANDUM & ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion to Dismiss (Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing
43
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. Memorandum and Order. "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) Defendant's objections to Magistrate Judge Bowler's Report and Recommendation (the R&R) (Docket No. 42 ) are, with respect to Coun ts II and III, SUSTAINED, but are otherwise OVERRULED, and 2) Magistrate Judge Bowler's R&R (Docket No. 41 ) pertaining to defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Docket No. 5 ) is, with respect to Counts I, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII and IX, ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, but is, with respect to Counts II and III, REJECTED. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
