Lenfest, v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Lenfest, v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Lenfest, v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Brian Lenfest
Defendant:	Verizon Communications, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2013cv11596
Filed:	July 3, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Barnstable
Presiding Judge:	Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 4, 2015	Filing 52 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: MEMORANDUM & ORDER entered. Verizons 20 motion to strike and for leave to file a bill of costs is, to the extent it seeks leave to file a bill of costs, ALLOWED but, to the extent it seeks to strike language from plaintiffs 43 notice of voluntary dismissal, DENIED. (Danieli, Chris)
September 29, 2014	Filing 41 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLCs motion to compel arbitration (Docket No. 20 ) is ALLOWED. The case is STAYED pending arbitration. Verizon Enterpri se Solutions, LLC's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 22 ) is DENIED as moot. The parties are directed to submit to this Court a joint status report with respect to the progress of the arbitration proceeding on March 31, 2015 and every six months thereafter. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 4, 2015

Filing 52 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: MEMORANDUM & ORDER entered. Verizons 20 motion to strike and for leave to file a bill of costs is, to the extent it seeks leave to file a bill of costs, ALLOWED but, to the extent it seeks to strike language from plaintiffs 43 notice of voluntary dismissal, DENIED. (Danieli, Chris)

September 29, 2014

Filing 41 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLCs motion to compel arbitration (Docket No. 20 ) is ALLOWED. The case is STAYED pending arbitration. Verizon Enterpri se Solutions, LLC's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 22 ) is DENIED as moot. The parties are directed to submit to this Court a joint status report with respect to the progress of the arbitration proceeding on March 31, 2015 and every six months thereafter. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lenfest, v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Lenfest
Represented By:	Preston W. Leonard
Represented By:	David Pastor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Communications, Inc.
Represented By:	William A. Worth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?