Hudson v. MacEachern
Mac Hudson and August Evan |
Duane MacEachern, Scott Anderson, Keith Nano, Timothy Bariamis and Christine Brockleman |
1:2013cv12395 |
September 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
Rya W. Zobel |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. It is hereby ORDERED that by the close of business on November 23,2015, the Plaintiff shall respond to the motion for summary judgment or face dismissal of his case. A copy of this Order has been mailed to the Plaintiff, Auguste via first class and certified mail (Ref# 0570). (Responses due by 11/23/2015)(Montes, Mariliz) |
Filing 43 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS entered 20 Defendants Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.denying 39 Motion for Leave to File Document ; granting 29 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the ca ption of the document.; granting 30 Motion for Discovery; granting 32 Motion Motion to Dismiss; denying 34 Motion to Amend; denying 35 Motion for Hearing; denying 36 Motion for Leave to File Document (See attached Order). (Montes, Mariliz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.