Gourdeau v. City of Newton
| Jo Anne Gourdeau |
| City of Newton and Newton Police Department |
| 1:2013cv12832 |
| November 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION "For the preceding reasons, this Court held that a general verdict was inappropriate in this case and instead charged the jury to return a special verdict under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49(a). This Court now concludes that retaliation claims brought under the FMLA must be proved according to a but-for causation standard."(Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing
70
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered denying 67 Motion for Entry of Separate and Final Judgment and to Stay the Remaining Claim (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
64
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered Order on Report and Recommendation For the foregoing reasons, as well as the reasons advanced in the Report andRecommendation (CM/ECF No. 61), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (CM/ECF No. 37) i s ALLOWED as to Counts I and II, but DENIED as to Count III. Within fourteen (14) days, the parties shall file a joint status report stating (a) the anticipated duration of trial; (b) whether the parties anticipate any mediation process and, if so, t he amount of time needed for such a process (either in the Courts mediationprogram or otherwise as the parties prefer); and (c) whether all parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge assigned to this case (the parties shall not report their individual positions and the failure to consent shall not result in any adverse substantiveconsequence). (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
