Sophos Inc v. RPost Holdings, Inc. et al
| Sophos Inc |
| RPost Holdings, Inc., RPost Communications Ltd. and RPost International Ltd. |
| 1:2013cv12856 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Denise J. Casper |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
282
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court DENIES Sophos' motion for summary judgment with respect to standing, D. 207, ALLOWS Sophos' motion for summary judgment on patent validity, D. 201, finding the '628 patent invalid, and DENIES as moot the remaining summary judgment motions, D. 207 (as to lost profits), D. 221, D. 251. Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-12856-DJC, 1:14-cv-13628-DJC(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
128
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER on Claims Construction. The Court DENIES Sophos's motion for judgment on the pleadings, D. 95; No. 14-cv-13628, D. 71.Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-12856-DJC, 1:14-cv-13628-DJC(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
75
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - RPost's motion to dismiss, D. 62, is DENIED. (Hourihan, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
53
Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' motions to transfer to the Eastern District of Texas, D. 24, 34, are DENIED.(Hourihan, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
