Awbrey v. DiGangi
Plaintiff: Brian J. Awbrey
Defendant: Peter DiGangi
Case Number: 1:2013cv13096
Filed: November 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1218
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. In accordance with this Court's order dated January 2, 2014, and the plaintiff not having shown good cause why this case should not be dismissed, it is ORDERED that the within action be and it is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). (PSSA, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Awbrey v. DiGangi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian J. Awbrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter DiGangi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?