Mekonnen v. ABM Parking Services, Inc.

Defendant: ABM Parking Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Abebe Mekonnen
Case Number: 1:2014cv12389
Filed: June 5, 2014
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Indira Talwani
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 2, 2014 30 Opinion or Order of the Court Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered re 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by ABM Parking Services, Inc. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. (MacDonald, Gail)
October 10, 2014 32 Opinion or Order of the Court Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(MacDonald, Gail)
January 7, 2015 51 Opinion or Order of the Court Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. (MacDonald, Gail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mekonnen v. ABM Parking Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABM Parking Services, Inc.
Represented By: Sean P. O'Connor
Represented By: Gregory A. Manousos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abebe Mekonnen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.