Knox v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
| Thomas Knox |
| Massachusetts Department of Correction, Michael Corsini, Abbe Nelligan, Karen Dinardo, Forensic Health Services and Kimberly Lyman |
| 1:2014cv12457 |
| May 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| George A. OToole |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The Court finds that theMotion for a Preliminary Injunction is MOOT, and thus DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE...To the extent Count 5 alleges that the Defendants have conditioned medically necessary treatment on Knoxs waiver of his confidentiality rights, the Motions to Dismiss are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal on summary judgment. In all other respects the Motions to Dismiss are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal on summary judgment. In light of the foregoing, the parties shall file within 10 days a joint status report: (1) identifying the claims, if any, Knox intends to press; and (2) including a proposed focused and prompt discovery schedule, including summary judgment deadlines. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Boal for all purposes including both dispositive and non-dispositive motions. re 62 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 63 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 69 Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing
10
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and any assessment of the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) is DEFERRED. Within 42 days of the date of this Order, plaintiff either mu st submit his certified prison account statement under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or submit a statement indicating that he is a civilly committed patient. Failure to comply with this directive may result in dismissal of this action. Denying without preju dice 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Granting 5 Motion to Amend to the extent Knox seeks to add a two-page addendum to his complaint after page 13. The Clerk shall issue summonses for service of the six defendants. The plaintiff may elect to ha ve service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve the summons, complaint, addendum, and this Order upon the defendants, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 120 days from the date of this Order to complete service. (PSSA, 3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
