Eck v. Neal et al
| David Eck |
| Jonathan Neal, Laurie Bradley-Harrington, Thomas Kelley, Roger Silva, Jr. and Kingston, Town of |
| 1:2014cv13693 |
| September 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| Douglas P. Woodlock |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.1) Summary judgment is GRANTED on Count I as to the arrest without probable cause claim agai nst both Officer Neal and Officer Bradley-Harrington;2) Summary judgment is GRANTED on Count I as to the excessive force claim against Officer Bradley-Harrington but DENIED as to the excessive force claim against Officer Neal;3) S ummary judgment is DENIED on Count I as to the claim for retaliatory arrest in violation of First Amendment claim against Officers Neal and Bradley-Harrington;4) Summary judgment is GRANTED on Count III (Massachusetts Civil Rights A ct claims against all individual Defendants);5) Summary judgment is DENIED on Counts IV and V (intentional tort claims against all individual Defendants); and6) Summary judgment is GRANTED on Count VI (Monell claim against the Town).SO ORDERED. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
