In Re: Parry
| 1:2015cv10686 |
| March 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.On June 4, 2018, Magistrate Judge Bowler issued a Report and Recommendation (#133) recommending that the Court allow 3A Marine Service's Motion for Summary Judgment (#117) on all claims asserted ag ainst it. The time for filing objections has passed without any filing by any party. After de novo review of the pending matter, the Court hereby ADOPTS Judge Bowler's 133 Report and Recommendation and ALLOWS 117 3A Marine's Motion fo r Summary Judgment. The parties shall file a joint status report no later than July 6, 2018 stating (1) the claims that remain for trial; (2) the anticipated duration of trial; (3) whether all remaining parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge to conduct the trial; and (4) whether the remaining parties wish to mediate the remaining claims. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Parry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
