Cottrell v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
| Surpaul Cottrell |
| Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Parole Board Members Jane and John Doe, Parole Officers John Doe(s), Department of Corrections, Grossi, Brittney Grossi, John Walsh and Unknown John and Jane Does |
| 1:2015cv10728 |
| March 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Plymouth |
| Marianne B. Bowler |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Within 28 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, Cottrell may notify the court in writing if he seeks to proceed here; In the event that Cottrell does not notify the court that he se eks to proceed in this court, the action will be dismissed without prejudice;In the event that Cottrell does notify the court that he seeks to proceed in this court, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) will b e allowed and the filing fee will be assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) and Plaintiff will be directed to demonstrate good cause why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order; and no summonses shall issue pending further Order of the Court.(PSSA, 1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
