SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CIMCON LIGHTING, INC.
Plaintiff: SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant: CIMCON LIGHTING, INC.
Case Number: 1:2015cv11545
Filed: April 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Bristol
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERMARKMAN ORDERIn accordance with the foregoing, with respect to United States Patent No. 7,825,793:A) the preamble to claim 1 is construed as limiting;B) the wireless protocol means: the Zigbee protocol;C) end user device means: a device that collects information about a local parameter;D) employs a ZigBee protocol to communicate outside the target zone is accorded its plain and ordinary meaning;E) actuator means: a device capable of detecting, monitoring, or controlling a local parameter;F) interact with is accorded its plain and ordinary meaning;G) target zone means: a physical area that contains a local pa rameter, with the exception of a street light pole on which a communication node is mounted which node also functions as an end user device;H) within is accorded its plain and ordinary meaning;I) adjacent is accorded its plain and ordinary meaning;J) end user is accorded its plain and ordinary meaning;K) end user adapted to communicate is accorded its plain and ordinary meaning.So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie)
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 56 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 55 Joint MOTION to Amend 53 Supplemental Scheduling Order. See attached order. (Caruso, Stephanie)
November 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. "the motion of defendant Cimcom Lighting, Inc. to dismiss (Docket No. 20), is, with respect to the claims of direct infringement, induced infringement and willful infringement, DENIED, but is, with respect to the claimof contributory infringement, ALLOWED."(Caruso, Stephanie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CIMCON LIGHTING, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: Michael A. Albert
Represented By: William Brett Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CIMCON LIGHTING, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?