Provanzano v. MTD Products Company, et al
Anthony Provanzano |
MTD Products Company and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC |
1:2015cv11720 |
April 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Suffolk |
Nathaniel M. Gorton |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 187 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERFor the forgoing reasons,1) plaintiffs motion for judgment on his 93A claim (Docket No. 172) is DENIED and2) plaintiffs motion for judgment as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, for a new trial (Docket No. 179) is DENIED. So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie) |
Filing 156 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 150 Motion in Limine Order Court Security Personnel to Allow Exemplar Mower Into the Courthouse for Purposes of Trial (Caruso, Stephanie) |
Filing 98 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER,For the foregoing reasons, 1) Defendants motion to exclude the testimony of Mr. Kevin Sevart (Docket No. 38) is DENIED and2) Plaintiffs motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Sandra Metzler (Docket No. 53) is DENIED. So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie) |
Filing 33 Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell: ORDER entered. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (#27) granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Compel. See attached order for full details. (Russo, Noreen) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.