CSX Transportation, Inc. et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
| CSX Transportation, Inc., CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc., National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Springfield Terminal Railway Company |
| COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and Maura Healey |
| 1:2015cv12865 |
| June 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Railway Labor Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs renewed motion forsummary judgment on Count 1 (Docket No. 90) is ALLOWED,defendants renewed cross-motion for summary judgment on Count 1(Docket No. 93) is DENIED and the union intervenors renewedcross-motion for summary judgment on Count 1 (Docket No. 95) isDENIED. (Lima, Christine)
|
|
Filing
62
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 45 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 48 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment "plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Count 1 (Docket No. 29) is ALLOWED, defendants motion for summary judgment on Count 1 (Docket No. 45) is DENIED and the union intervenors motion for summary judgment on Count 1 (Docket No. 48) is DENIED.So ordered."(Caruso, Stephanie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
