Melo v. Lawrence Plaza Limited Partnership
Plaintiff: Andres Ramon Melo
Defendant: Lawrence Plaza Limited Partnership
Case Number: 1:2015cv13472
Filed: September 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: F. Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1218
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. Memorandum and Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (Pezzarossi, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melo v. Lawrence Plaza Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andres Ramon Melo
Represented By: Edward N. Garno
Represented By: Todd W. Shulby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Plaza Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?