Pomeroy et al v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Patrick Bartholomew and Martin Pomeroy
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc. and FanDuel, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2015cv13625
Filed: October 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: George A OToole
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Filing 7 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: OPINION and ORDER entered. (McKillop, Matthew)
March 11, 2016 Filing 6 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. MDL PROCEDURAL ORDER No. 2 REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND SUBMISSIONS Associated Cases: 1:16-md-02677-GAO et al.(Halley, Taylor)
February 26, 2016 Filing 5 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. MDL Procedural Order No. 1. Associated Cases: 1:16-md-02677-GAO et al.(Halley, Taylor)
February 1, 2016 Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing with the MDL Court a Consolidated Supplemental Memorandum regarding Motions to Transfer, and Responses therto, Pursuant to 28:1407 by FanDuel, Inc. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-13602-RWZ et al.(Jones, Sherry)
October 22, 2015 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (McDonagh, Christina)
October 22, 2015 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-5805783 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Patrick Bartholomew, Martin Pomeroy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Local Category Form)(Gilman, Kenneth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pomeroy et al v. DraftKings, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Bartholomew
Represented By: Kenneth G. Gilman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Pomeroy
Represented By: Kenneth G. Gilman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FanDuel, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?